More racist stuff from the right.
Here is his full statement un-edited.
SAVAGE: We are living through -- and I'm going to connect the dots for you rapidly -- a low-grade communist revolution in the United States of America. Let me explain. When Mao Zedong took over China, after a certain period of time, the doctors were taken out of the surgical wards and put into the laundries and made to do laundry. And the communists took the laundresses who were uneducated dolts and took them to the surgical rooms and said, "Perform surgery." When the young women who couldn't -- who before, were laundresses were told to perform surgery said, "But I don't know how to do it," they were shot as counterrevolutionaries.
What we have today as a result of affirmative action and unchecked illegal immigration is the equivalent of a socialist revolution in the United States of America, where intelligence itself is not only suspect, but intelligence itself will soon be declared racist and a trick of the white man. And so if your student works very hard -- your child works very hard and gets a straight-A average, you will hear the affirmative actioneers say, "Why, those grades mean nothing. Life experiences are what count." And the life-experience racket is how they've been able to push dummies ahead of the kid who gets straight A's.
That's how they can take submorons and make them the captain in police forces, while the white man, who gets, let's say, a 100 on a written test, is given a 50 on an oral test with an aggregate score of a 75. So a dummy who got a 50 on a written test can be given 150 with an extra grade for being not white and come up with an aggregate score of 100 and be made the white man's captain inside the police departments of the United States of America. Do you understand what I just said to you? Well, you do if you're a white man and you're in the police department.
They have a new racket. They don't call it affirmative action. The racket works like this: First, they give you a written test, which you can't cheat on. So if the white guy gets, let's say, a 98 or 100, they then give him what's called an oral exam. The oral exam is conducted preferably by a lesbian and a person of color who usually gives the white man a 30 or a 20 on the exam for not being properly communicating. [sic] Then, of course, if they get a minority in there who got a 30 or a 40 on the written exam, they give him a 100 or a 150 on the oral, and so the minority winds up with a higher aggregate score and he becomes the captain in the police department. That's called communism.
Actually not one to correct Mr. Savage but to me Communism is government that spies on it's own people is communism. A government that takes away freedoms of it's own people is comminism. That's wrong but again I wonder where Mr. Savage keeps his white hood.
16 comments:
Erik, you obviously have no clue as to what Communism means. Communism, in its purest intention, is not evil. It just has proven itself time and time again that it doesn't work.
Let me educate you. This is how Communism is supposed to work.
Communism is a system where everybody is treated the same. Everything is owned by the State. Individuals own nothing. They owe everything to the State. Individuals are assigned a position by the State and everybody gets paid the same. The payment is usually some form of allowances to enable one to obtain goods from the State.
The reason this system doesn't work is because the people have no power and its very easy for corrupt State officials to abuse their power. The other problem with Communism is that there is little or no incentive to acheive anything beyond what is expected of you. In other words, there's no competition.
(I know you are not going to like what I say here)
Left-wingers in this country who believe in governmental heavy regulating of businesses or downright owning of businesses (the post office and utility companies come to mind) believe in a form of communism in this country. Affirmative action falls right into this, it says, as the article you quote says, that someone with inferior skills can compete. This is wrong in my opinion. It is very un-American where one should strive to be the best he or she can be and if you don't, you pay the price.
From Dictionary.com
com·mu·nism ( P ) Pronunciation Key (kmy-nzm)
n.
A theoretical economic system characterized by the collective ownership of property and by the organization of labor for the common advantage of all members.
Communism
A system of government in which the state plans and controls the economy and a single, often authoritarian party holds power, claiming to make progress toward a higher social order in which all goods are equally shared by the people.
The Marxist-Leninist version of Communist doctrine that advocates the overthrow of capitalism by the revolution of the proletariat.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[French communisme, from commun, common, from Old French, from Latin commnis. See commune2.]
[Download Now or Buy the Book]
Source: The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company.
Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
Communism
n 1: a form of socialism that abolishes private ownership 2: a political theory favoring collectivism in a classless society
Again look at what Bush has done to our rights and look especially at the noun definition and you tell me. I think it describes what we are becomming perfectly.
I agree that we are becoming more communist. That's not Bush though. Obviously, you still don't get what communism is.
Let me put it this way. Since communism doesn't allow private ownership, who do you think owns everything? The State does.
Now, let's apply this.
-Democrats want the government (State) to have more contol over businesses.
-Democrats, in making it harder to be in business by imposing more taxes and regulations on them, are forcing businesses to leave the United States. This forces more businesse to be under governmental control (there are many examples of this: schools, airlines, ports, and TV stations.)
-Democrats favor communistic ideas like having a minimum wage, thus hurting the competive free-market.
-Democrats believe in affirmative action, as I mentioned above, this impedes the spirit of competiveness and free-enterprise. It also, promotes racism.
-Democrats believe that disasters like Katrina are the responsibility of the federal government to deal with. That's utter communism as it kills free-enterprise (Erik, you even condemmed Bush about allowing only certain companies to help re-build New Orleans)
Before you retort that "Many Republicans believe in this stuff too!" I realize that. It's all part of the dumbing-down of America.
Communism is coming from within. I intend to fight it every step of the way. Capitalism is not always fair, but it's the best socio-economic system in the world. Unfortunately, the leftists in the world are holding sway.
By the way, in the definitions of communism, you posted, they all agree with the definition I gave you.
Do you remember the recent Supreme Court ruling? Where they said cities can take your property if big business wants to build on it? I guess not.
It's called "Imminent Domain". I deal with cases like this all the time in my job. That is not a new idea.
It's called not owning your own property if cities,states want to take it. It's exactly communism.
Quoted by Erik Jan 26, 2006 on purdrivel
"...the original plan they had for freeways in this city. If what was planned actually got built that would have made things so much better. As far as fast cars go. They will be built as long as people want them to be built."
"Let's see. Origianlly Reseda Blvd, Sherman Way, Topanga Cyn, Las Virgines Cyn, Coldwater Cyn, Pacific Coast Highway and others were origianlly supposed to be freeways as well as one going from Beverly Hills to LAX. Tell me if you don't think that would make things better[?]"
By your own definition, you must be a communist since you seem to be okay with the government buying out people's homes so they can build more freeways.
But actually getting to the point of the post is it ok for Savage to accuse democrats/liberals of wanting communism where it's obvious where BUsh is taking us? And again if I may remind you which party (Republicans) are in control of every branch of the government?
Think of it this way.
If you take the Left to the extreme, you get communism.
If you take the Right to the extreme, you get fascism.
Neither one is good. If you want to accuse Bush of heading somewhere, though, it would be fascism.
This is not to say I'm agreeing with this, but you do make comparisons between Bush and Hitler and Hitler was a fascist, not a communist.
And another point that you have failed to address is why is it ok for these right-wingers to be racist?
What's that supposed to mean? Being against affirmative action is not racism. In fact, being in favor of affirmative action is racism.
(I'll be out tomorrow, so I'll address whatever response you have on Sunday.)
Ok obviously you don't read my website. Just my previous post I typed how Bill O'Reilly said how liberals are upset at "the white power structure". I've typed Glen Beck saying how you can abort every black baby and the crime rate would go down. I have quotes from Hannity, Coltier, Rush all obviously racist but I guess that's ok with you.
Of course, I read your blog site.
I have a new word for you; Context
O'Reilly is expressing his opinion on how he believes liberals think. He is basically saying that liberals are racist. I'm not saying I agree with him, but I do say his statement, by itself, is certainly not racist.
Did you actually listen to Beck's statement or did you just read it in a website? I'll tell you, I listened to the comment and what was said before and after. Beck wasn't being racist, he was just being utterly stupid in making such a comment that would be obvious fodder for the media.
I heard the whole thing. That's racism if I ever heard it. I don't believe you are making excuses for them.
And remember part of being racist is being ignorant and stupid and close-minded like they are.
Post a Comment