It's about time someone established in the Democrat party stood up to the character assasination attempt on Ned Lamont. That person is President Bill Clinton
From dailykos.com
Well, if I were Joe and I was running as an independent, that's what I'd say, too," Clinton said. "But that's not quite right. That is, there were almost no Democrats who agreed with his position, which was, 'I want to attack Iraq whether or not they have weapons of mass destruction.'"
"His position is the Bush-Cheney-Rumsfeld position, which was, 'Does it matter if they have weapons? None of this matters. ... This is a big, important priority, and 9/11 gives us the way of attacking and deposing Saddam.'"
Clinton said that a vote for Lamont was not, as Lieberman had implied, a vote against the country's security.
. . . Clinton said he campaigned for Lieberman because they had been friends for 35 years, and Clinton did not want the Democratic Party split over Iraq.
Just remember what party was going to allow our ports to be taken over by a country who supports terrorists, what party was in control 9/11 and what party has forgotten about the person who attacked us on 9/11.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment