Again just wondering when Cheney said critics of the Iraq war are "dishonest and reprehensible" and then says in a speech yesterday (here is the exact quote) ""I do not believe it is wrong to criticize the war on terror or any aspect thereof," then he says a few minutes later ""What is not legitimate, and what I will again say is dishonest and reprehensible, is the suggestion by some U.S. senators that the president . . . misled the American people on prewar intelligence." This, he said, "is revisionism of the most corrupt and shameless variety."
Here is a few things I don't understand (I know it's more but let's start with this): We are supposed to have free speech in this country last I checked we have the right to agree with people and to disagree with people yet people who are against the war like myself have been called dissenters, I've been told I'm treasonist (funny how the same people who outed a covert CIA op are calling other people that) I've been told in no uncertain terms support the President or else nevermind these people are the same who critisized President Clinton for Bosnia and Rwanda and for having cuts to directly go after Osama Bin Laden I mean if these people are the biggest hippocrites out there and the media, the so-called "liberal" media doesn't call them on it.
By the way I see O'Reilly even has been thinking about starting an "enemies list" of websites that are liberal and have the courage to attack him. I say and have sent him an email stating to start with this little site here because I will continue to speak compliment when deserved complain when deserved and promote free speech whether you agree with what I say or disagree. These people need to be stopped I'd recommend prozac to call them down but at least one of them (Limbaugh) is already a drug addict.