Excuse me, but you can't say anything until UCLA actually wins a title. Then, you still can't say too much as USC's football team has done much more than that in recent years.
UCLA is winning the games they are supposed to. Where was USC when the game was on the line? I'm not expecting UCLA to beat Memphis BUT the fact when no one at the beginning of the year (including me) expected them to get this far and they have shows more about UCLA heart then USC choking the big game.
When UCLA loses, this season will be soon forgotten. USC will be remembered for a long time for coming so close to winning 3 consecutive titles.
As for USC's heart. I guess you did not watch the Notre Dame game last year, a game that some are arguing was the best college football game in history.
...And since you keep bringing this up, let's not forget the major egg UCLA's football team laid against Miami back in the late 1990's.
Let's see.. Coming close to winning... THat sounds like loser talk. The fact is this run is more then any UCLA fan ever expected. Where was USC when it counted (the National Championship) oh yeah they choked.
And I actually did see the Notre Dame game and I have one question: So?? If you live in the moment as I am you will see (albiet temporarily) UCLA has a longer football winning streak then USC. But I guess USC has a proud past in football like UCLA has in basketball so don't think I don't know the history but this is now and right now UCLA is way better then USC.
"If you live in the moment as I am you will see (albiet temporarily) UCLA has a longer football winning streak then USC."
What is that supposed to mean? UCLA currently has a one game winning streak. USC has zero. USC lost to Number 2 Texas, UCLA beat Northwestern. Big Deal!
Sounds like Robert you can't deal with facts. UCLA has a longer streak in football. Opponents don't matter the fact is they do. Fact is UCLA won one of the most draining basketball games I've ever heard (listened at work) while the last big game USC was in they chocked. In the moment UCLA is better then USC in Football and Basketball. Deal the the fact.
No argument about basketball. You've got to be freaking crazy to even fathom that UCLA is anywhere remotely close to USC in football. I'm sure there's some Little League team that thinks they are better than the Dodgers because they won more games recently. That doesn't make it so.
I'm saying as of NOW they are. At the end of next season we will see but as of right now they are. It's like in baseball everyone is 0-0 right now. Right now UCLA has a bigger winning streak then USC. Will that be the facts at the end of the football season who knows but right now they do.
9 comments:
Excuse me, but you can't say anything until UCLA actually wins a title. Then, you still can't say too much as USC's football team has done much more than that in recent years.
UCLA is winning the games they are supposed to. Where was USC when the game was on the line? I'm not expecting UCLA to beat Memphis BUT the fact when no one at the beginning of the year (including me) expected them to get this far and they have shows more about UCLA heart then USC choking the big game.
When UCLA loses, this season will be soon forgotten. USC will be remembered for a long time for coming so close to winning 3 consecutive titles.
As for USC's heart. I guess you did not watch the Notre Dame game last year, a game that some are arguing was the best college football game in history.
...And since you keep bringing this up, let's not forget the major egg UCLA's football team laid against Miami back in the late 1990's.
Let's see.. Coming close to winning... THat sounds like loser talk. The fact is this run is more then any UCLA fan ever expected. Where was USC when it counted (the National Championship) oh yeah they choked.
And I actually did see the Notre Dame game and I have one question: So?? If you live in the moment as I am you will see (albiet temporarily) UCLA has a longer football winning streak then USC. But I guess USC has a proud past in football like UCLA has in basketball so don't think I don't know the history but this is now and right now UCLA is way better then USC.
"If you live in the moment as I am you will see (albiet temporarily) UCLA has a longer football winning streak then USC."
What is that supposed to mean? UCLA currently has a one game winning streak. USC has zero. USC lost to Number 2 Texas, UCLA beat Northwestern. Big Deal!
Sounds like Robert you can't deal with facts. UCLA has a longer streak in football. Opponents don't matter the fact is they do. Fact is UCLA won one of the most draining basketball games I've ever heard (listened at work) while the last big game USC was in they chocked. In the moment UCLA is better then USC in Football and Basketball. Deal the the fact.
No argument about basketball. You've got to be freaking crazy to even fathom that UCLA is anywhere remotely close to USC in football. I'm sure there's some Little League team that thinks they are better than the Dodgers because they won more games recently. That doesn't make it so.
I'm saying as of NOW they are. At the end of next season we will see but as of right now they are. It's like in baseball everyone is 0-0 right now. Right now UCLA has a bigger winning streak then USC. Will that be the facts at the end of the football season who knows but right now they do.
Post a Comment